Wednesday, May 22, 2019

Communications Decency Act Essay

Different countries be in possession of different laws. Since different countries have different laws, internet service providers from different countries have different policies. Because of that, it will be hard to come up with a universal standard for the Internet. And enforcing that standard will be a different theme on its own. The laws concerning decency ar only as good as those who are willing to abide by them (Grossman internet). There have been a lot of attempts to censor the Internet. There has been an attempt to make censorship on the Internet a law, as a part of the telecommunications bill, Communications Decency Act, shortened as CDA.CDA would have do it a crime to post anything on the internet that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by modern-day community standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs (Grossman internet). Also caught up in the internet-censorship-fervor are the software companies. Almost overnight, many companies sprang up providing parents and libraries programs that promised to strive out all the inappropriate materials on the Internet. Branched out from the reach programs are filter search railway locomotives.Basically, it is a same old search engine that puts its results through the filter engines. Another attempt to censor the Internet is made by companies that attempted to rate every website on the homepage. They are independent companies that determine each website and give it a rating. All of the attempts to censor the Internet had been ineffective. All of the past actions about Internet censorship have been, more or less, failures. The filter programs have failed to truly filter out the unwanted. It is like employ mesh wires to filter out basketballs.Not only do you filter out the basketballs, you as well filter out the tennis balls and golf balls. The filter programs filters by two ways searching for keywords or blocking a list of websites previously reviewed by som eone as inappropriate. When the filter program filter out websites by keyword, they also filter out a lot of appropriate and possibly useable information. For example, a website containing information about breast crabmeat would be blocked out because it contained the word breast. Same result would happen with a website containing a normal for chicken breast.When the filter program uses the pre-made list to block out, it is very accurate because someone has already reviewed the website, and would not confuse a website about breast cancer with a breast fetish website. However, thither are two downfalls to the method. First, there is just too many websites to review. There are literally billions of websites out there and millions of new ones being made everyday. If a staff of a thousand people reviewed day and night for a year, they still wouldnt have gotten closure to reviewing all the websites. Second, unlike books and magazines, Internet websites come and go on a snap of a fing er.It doesnt take long to create a homepage, uncomplete does relocating it. The second a new list of banned website is released, it is already obsolete. Since the so-called family-friendly search engines are based on the same inefficient filter programs, they are also inefficient. Only a very small fraction of the Internet contains inappropriate material, however, the inefficient family-friendly search engines filters out around 95% of the Internet ( faulty internet). in time when Dr. Suess was searched, most of the websites were blocked. 2630 of the 2638 websites found in a normal search engine was blocked (Faulty internet).It is a fact that pornography websites tend to cerebrate themselves all over the search engine to attract the most customers. But do they really link themselves to 99. 7% of a Dr. Suess search (Faulty internet)? Even after they wiped out 99. 7% of the search result, one of the eight that wasnt blocked was an inappropriate website (Faulty internet). It was a p arody of a Dr. Suess story using details from the murder of Nicole Brown Simpson (Faulty internet). The companies that tried to set up a rating system have provided to succeed either. The companies have yet created an universal standard for the ratings.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.